Dark Mode Light Mode

Subscribe to The Edit for regular how-to's and special invites to exclusive workshops!!

By pressing the Subscribe button, you confirm that you have read and are agreeing to our Privacy and Terms of Use.

Women Over 35 Who Are Still Making the Best Punk
The Politics of the Pad: Who Profits When You Bleed

The Politics of the Pad: Who Profits When You Bleed

The period industry was built on silence and scented plastic. We’ve paid taxes on our own biology while being told to hide it in pastel packaging. “The Politics of the Pad” unpacks the pink tax, the profit machine, and the feminist rebellion rewriting the story of how we bleed.
A period pad in a hyper neon collage of money. A period pad in a hyper neon collage of money.
image credit: AXO

Let’s start here: if you’ve ever wondered why a razor marketed to men costs $6 and the pink one beside it costs $9, congratulations — you’ve met the pink tax. It’s the invisible surcharge on being perceived as feminine. It shows up on razors, shampoo, deodorant, and of course, period products. Because apparently, capitalism thinks gendered biology is a luxury.

For something that’s natural, essential, and unavoidable, periods have been one of the most expensive taboos in history. In Canada, the average menstruating person spends over $6,000 in their lifetime on tampons, pads, liners, painkillers, and “discreet” packaging — the kind designed to make sure no one can tell what’s in your purse. Until 2015, all of that was taxed as non-essential. Non-essential, while golf club memberships and erectile dysfunction meds sailed through untaxed. If you’ve ever wanted a case study in how bias hides in plain sight, there it is.

The Blue Liquid Lie

You know those vintage ads where they pour cool blue liquid onto pads like we’re hydrating a Powerade commercial? That was never about hygiene. That was a marketing strategy built on embarrassment. “Hide it. Mask it. Pretend it doesn’t exist.” The entire industry made its money convincing women to be discreet, to keep quiet, to buy more products so no one would know they were bleeding.

It’s not just dated — it’s dangerous. That culture of secrecy has left generations of people without real menstrual education. Even now, medical research underfunds period-related pain and disorders. Endometriosis is still dismissed as “bad cramps.” PMS is shorthand for “irrational.” You can’t fix what society refuses to name.

The Pink Tax, The Profit, The Problem

Let’s be clear: the pink tax isn’t an accident. It’s a business model. Companies have long known they can charge more for “women’s” versions of basic items — even if the ingredients, formulas, or functions are identical. Add a pastel label and a bit of soft-focus shame, and suddenly the price goes up. It’s textbook gendered capitalism, wrapped in flowers and buzzwords like “fresh” and “discreet.”

Meanwhile, “feminine hygiene” aisles are still filled with single-use plastics, heavily fragranced pads, and toxic messaging about “cleanliness.” Those perfumes and chemicals don’t make you cleaner — they make corporations richer.

The Cup, the Cloth, and the Counterculture

The quiet revolution in all this is reusable period care — cups, discs, cloth pads, period underwear. It’s the first real challenge to disposable culture since the invention of the tampon. A cup lasts up to ten years, saving hundreds of dollars and keeping thousands of pads and tampons out of landfills. But more than that, it changes the relationship you have with your body.

You have to learn it. You have to know your flow, your cervix height, your anatomy. That kind of body literacy is political — especially in a world that’s spent centuries telling women their bodies are too complicated to understand.

Reusable care isn’t just eco-friendly; it’s radical self-knowledge.

Blood, Bias, and Better Design

The first tampon patent was filed by a man. The first cup was shelved because it wasn’t profitable enough. Menstruation innovation stalled for decades because men controlled the money and the labs. Now, independent brands — run by people who actually bleed — are rewriting the rules. They’re making better products, pushing for menstrual equity laws, and donating cups to communities that still face period poverty.

And that matters. Because “period poverty” isn’t just about missing school or work — it’s about dignity. It’s about having the choice to manage your cycle safely and sustainably.

Let’s Talk About Power (and Pads)

When you look at the menstrual care industry, what you’re really seeing is a map of who holds power — and who profits when we stay quiet. That’s why conversations about cups and discs aren’t just about convenience. They’re about liberation.

If you make a period product and you’re not part of that liberation, what are you selling?

At She Zine Mag, we don’t partner with brands that treat bleeding like a problem to be fixed. We partner with brands that know it’s just part of being alive — and that a truly sustainable product starts with equity, transparency, and respect.

Because bleeding isn’t gross. It’s not unprofessional. It’s not shameful. It’s just biology — and it deserves better politics.


Partnership Note:

We’re actively looking to collaborate with companies that are rewriting the menstrual story — sustainably, inclusively, and without the pink tax. If your brand believes period care is more than a product, we should talk.

Subscribe to The Edit for regular how-to's and special invites to exclusive workshops!!

By pressing the Subscribe button, you confirm that you have read and are agreeing to our Privacy and Terms of Use.

Add a comment Add a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Previous Post
An image of Julie Doiron performing with Eric's Trip with doilies collaged around the edges

Women Over 35 Who Are Still Making the Best Punk